Work-related musculoskeletal complaints and ergonomic risk factors among Egyptian anesthesiologists: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists are vulnerable to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) due to sustained repetitive movements and awkward postures. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of WMSDs among anesthesiologists and to evaluate its association with ergonomic risk factors. METHODS: A convenience sample of 380 Egyptian anesthesiologists were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study through an electronic questionnaire. Data were collected from May to August 2022 and involved questions about participants' demographic, health, and work-related characteristics; the ergonomic risks and perceived hazards; and the musculoskeletal complaints during the past 12 months and 7 days - using Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate statistical analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of MSD and identify its determinants in the studied sample. RESULTS: A total of 215 anesthesiologists were included in this study, with a 56.8% response rate, 66% males with an average age of 38 (± 0.7) years. 21% were resident physicians, 47% were specialists, and 32% were consultants. The 12-month prevalence of MSD among anesthesiologists was 71.6% (95% CI: 65.6- 77.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that the main determinants of MSD among the studied sample were age of 45-years and older (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.21-8.52, p = 0.018), regular physical exercise (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.65, p = 0.005), insufficient rest time between procedures (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.15-4.41, p = 0.018), and three or more awkward postures of the trunk (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 1.43-8.82, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights a high prevalence of WMSDs among Egyptian anesthesiologists, linked to advancing age, lack of regular exercise, insufficient rest between procedures, and frequent awkward postures. Addressing these ergonomic risk factors through targeted workplace interventions is crucial for promoting the overall well-being of anesthesiologists and ensuring the provision of safe anesthesia services.

Comparing the quality of analgesia with ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block and serratus anterior plane block II in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: a randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recent use of serratus anterior plane (SAP) and pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks for pain management following breast surgery, there are insufficient data comparing their analgesic benefits. This study aimed to compare the quality of analgesia for PECS and SAP blocks in patients having modified radical mastectomy (MRM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This trial enrolled 50 adult female patients scheduled for MRM under anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. After induction of anaesthesia, 25 patients received US-guided PECS II block, and 25 patients received US-guided SAP block. The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic request. Secondary outcomes included the total analgesic consumption and postoperative pain during the first 24 hours as well as the total time to perform the block, surgeon satisfaction, haemodynamic parameters, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in the SAP group than in the PECS II block group (95% CI: 90.2-574.5, P = 0.009). The SAP block significantly lowered the total analgesics consumption, the 24 hours patient's need for analgesia, and the VAS scores immediately, as well as at 2, 8, 20, 22, and 24 hours postoperatively ( P < 0.005). Although it required a longer preparation time than PECS II block, the SAP block had comparable surgeons' satisfaction, haemodynamic parameters, and post-operative nausea and vomiting to PECS II block. CONCLUSIONS: Following MRM, US-guided SAP block provided a delayed time to first rescue analgesia with better acute pain control and lower total analgesic consumption compared to the PECS II block.

Analgesic effect of ketorolac as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block (I + II) for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Background and Aims: Many drugs have been tried as adjuvant to local anesthetic in different nerve blocks. Ketorolac is one of them, but it has never been used in pectoral nerve block. In this study, we evaluated its adjuvant effect with local anesthetic on postoperative analgesia in ultrasound (US)-guided pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks. The aim was to assess the quality and the duration of analgesia by the addition of ketorolac in the PECS block. Material and Methods: 46 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomies under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups: control group, where pectoral nerve block was given with bupivacaine 0.25% only; and ketorolac group, where the block was given with bupivacaine 0.25% and ketorolac 30 mg. Results: Patients who needed postoperative supplemental analgesia were significantly less in the ketorolac group (9 vs 21 patients, P = 0.00) and that first-time analgesic requirement was significantly later in the ketorolac group (14 hrs) postoperatively compared to the control group (9 hrs) postoperatively. Conclusion: Adding ketorolac to bupivacaine in pectoral nerve block safely increases postoperative duration of analgesia.

Determinants of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers among healthcare workers in Ismailia, Egypt: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) plays a fundamental role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination acceptance depends on perceptions of competence and motives of the providers, producers, health professionals, and policymakers. This study aimed to identify the frequency and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers among HCWs. METHODS: A total of 500 HCWs from 3 different hospital affiliations in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, were included in this mixed methods study. The study was conducted between March and April 2021 through two phases. Phase 1 included a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire with inquiries about different determinants of vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers, which was completed either electronically in a Google form or a hard printed copy. Phase 2 included four focus group discussions to explore the determinants in depth. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 33.9 ± 7.9 years, 70% were females, 51.2% were nurses, and 28.6% were physicians. Of the 500 HCWs, only 27.8% accepted taking the vaccine immediately, 49.2% refused, and 23% were hesitant. Vaccine safety was the highest associated factor with vaccine acceptance (odds ratio (OR) = 6.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.132-12.619), followed by previous uptake of influenza vaccine (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 2.048-5.217) and vaccine effectiveness (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.282-5.262). The main barriers to vaccine acceptance were mistrust in governmental policies during the pandemic or in the healthcare facility they work in. Hesitancy was common among females and nurses and was attributed to three prominent factors, including safety concerns, negative stories, and personal knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: The vaccine acceptance frequency among HCWs was considered low, as the majority either refused or was hesitant about taking the vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were significant determinants of vaccine acceptance. Factors related to trust were the main barriers to vaccine uptake. The health authority should establish a surveillance system for side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine and communicate this information between HCWs to decrease their worries about safety and increase vaccine uptake.

Physicians' Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Ethical and Medical Issues of Palliative Care in Suez Canal University Hospital.

Objectives: Palliative care (PC) includes a varied range of medical and ethical aspects that should be considered. The role of physicians in PC is crucial so this work explores physicians' knowledge, attitude and practice toward PC in Suez Canal University hospital in Egypt. Material and Methods: A questionnaire survey investigating physician's knowledge, attitude and practice in PC in 30 questions besides their personal and professional data. Results: Nearly 31% of participants received education in PC. Only 5.5% realised that PC should be introduced to patients at all health-care levels. Most participants (70.9%) were not aware about the WHO three-step analgesic ladder. About 57.7% and 43.6% of participants preferred informing terminal patients about their diagnosis and prognosis, respectively. More than half of participants (58.6%) agreed that the medical intervention decision is the patient's right and 63.2% agreed that do not resuscitate choice is the patient or his family right if he is incompetent. Participants who do not have advance care plans discussions with their terminal patients represented 53.6%. Conclusion: This study indicated lack of knowledge and insufficient professionalism during management of terminal patients regarding some medical and ethical issues of PC. Formal education and training are urgently needed to improve the holistic vision and practice of PC in Egypt.

Neutrophil to lymphocytic ratio and other inflammatory markers as adverse outcome predictor in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Early risk classification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients admitted to hospital is a critical key for providing optimal interventions. We investigated whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels and other inflammatory and coagulation markers could be predictors for the severity and mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This cross-sectional study included 155 COVID-19 patients diagnosed by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using oropharyngeal swabs. All patients had clinical examination, routine laboratory investigation, and chest computerized tomography scan. O2 saturation, serum D dimer, C reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and serum ferritin were assessed. NLR can predict the adverse outcome (e.g., disease deterioration and shock) at cut-off 6.65, with 92% sensitivity and 20.7% specificity. LDH at cut-off value of 364.5 had 79.3% sensitivity and 47% specificity. Ferritin at a cut-off value of 1036 had 60.9% sensitivity and 60.6% specificity. NLR alone was not an independent predictor for ICU, however, combining NLR with ferritin and LDH predicted the need for ICU. Total leucocytic count (TLC), neutrophil count, lymphocytic count, D dimer, and CRP were independent predictors for the need of ICU admission (P < 0.05). Admitted patients to ICU and dead patients had higher COVID-19 Reporting and Data System, length of stay, LDH, and ferritin and lower O2 saturation than non-admitted and alive ones. We concluded that NLR with ferritin and LDH markers had higher degree of sensitivity and specificity in detecting adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Other inflammatory biomarkers such as TLC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, D dimer, and CRP were predictive in this case.